I expect these neuro-centrists will find a neurological explanation for every thing also when there is none. Similar to early genetics studies that forgot about the strength of culture through generations.
About compression, I’m just trying this out. When we sing loud, the intensity changes the timbre of our voice. When we sing softly, th…
I expect these neuro-centrists will find a neurological explanation for every thing also when there is none. Similar to early genetics studies that forgot about the strength of culture through generations.
About compression, I’m just trying this out. When we sing loud, the intensity changes the timbre of our voice. When we sing softly, the recording will still need to be heard above all the other noises in the surrounding. To have a one on one increase from audible soft to timbre changing loud in electrical signal would make the loud passages way too loud and require huge amplification ruining our ears. But you do have to perform in your natural way, you cannot sing more intense but not too much louder, that would inhibit you. So the recording is compressed.
I expect these neuro-centrists will find a neurological explanation for every thing also when there is none. Similar to early genetics studies that forgot about the strength of culture through generations.
About compression, I’m just trying this out. When we sing loud, the intensity changes the timbre of our voice. When we sing softly, the recording will still need to be heard above all the other noises in the surrounding. To have a one on one increase from audible soft to timbre changing loud in electrical signal would make the loud passages way too loud and require huge amplification ruining our ears. But you do have to perform in your natural way, you cannot sing more intense but not too much louder, that would inhibit you. So the recording is compressed.