Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laurence Brevard's avatar

My oh my! We are GRUMPY aren't we?

I disagree with almost all of this. I'm 75 years old with a couple of EE degrees and first got paid to write software in 1967. I've spent a long and lucrative career at the border of hardware and software.

Even though I'm also a recent widower, having lost my wife (and CPA) of over 40 years in 2023, I'm amazingly upbeat. It helps that for almost 40 years I no longer drink alcohol or do drugs. Pro tip: do NOT watch any broadcast or cable TV "news." Read things instead, across a broad spectrum of views.

The performance to price ratio of computer technology has undergone something like a million to one transformation over the last 30-40 years. If you managed to get a slower computer for more money something is very wrong. Personally I'm enjoying dirt cheap off lease systems (mostly Dell) with extremely good performance - especially for the money.

And... I'm using a 43" 4K (UHD) TV that cost well under $250 as a monitor. That's mind blowing as is the price for 4K TVs in general.

I should probably mention that I use Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android after having used dozens of systems over my career (which predates the existence of UNIX!). What do I prefer? Windows hands down for desktop and iOS for mobile phones. [I've had cell phones since 1986.]

As for SpaceX - I am shocked if you don't understand how they are already at 1/100 the price to get mass to orbit and will be less than 1/1000 compared to most options when the BFR finally is flying. Good grief, it's only been TWO launch attempts and looking quite good for the third one. "Failure is not an option." is why SLS costs more per launch attempt than SpaceX has spent in its entire existence. Meanwhile it took SpaceX to get the US away from having to use Russian rockets to get to the space station. Not to mention over 200 successful landings of Falcon 9 boosters.

Starlink is nothing less than revolutionary.

As for Mr. bad boy's other main ventures, yeah, he is a seriously socially challenged person (as was Mr. Jobs) but to actually bring a new US based car company into functioning profitable existence is nothing short of astonishing. I have my engineering based suspicions as to how that's happened but I'll summarize it as realizing that designing the system to make the vehicles (or spacecraft) is at least as important as designing the thing you're making itself.

Meanwhile, even though journalists do, I don't give a rat's ass about the sewer that was Twitter or is X. Completely irrelevant to anything that I care about.

As for how web services are funded. If nothing else, going from a few thousand users to BILLIONS has profound effects on what it takes to serve those users. You have to pay for it somehow. I happen to prefer the subscription model to advertising but an awful lot of people will take "FREE" services that bombard them with ads. It appears Substack is showing a profitable path for subscriptions - I'm paying for YOU anyhow (and others).

And I actually do pay Google (for Google 1, for YouTube Premium, and as a Google Workspace user with my own domain). I am quite happy with the functionality I get.

Over in Zuckland, I've curated my Facebook feed into something actually useful - mostly in private groups on technical subjects. I also make heavy use of block and unfollow. Still, I'd happily pay them for a better experience.

Egregious offer: I'm also in the Austin area (NW) and would be happy to advise you at no charge on both hardware acquisition and more effective use of the systems running on that hardware! Meanwhile, maybe you could "learn" me a thang or to about jazz. ;-)

Figuring out how to contact me should not be very hard! Google me!!! Whatever...

Expand full comment
Eric Brown's avatar

Space travel isn't a thing yet. It's still way too expensive, and the only way to really get things cheap is to be willing to break things during test.

When you've got passengers or paid cargo onboard, things need to be reliable. But not during testing.

Expand full comment
217 more comments...

No posts