Why weren't they intellectual property? They had a clear owner even after they were co-opted by the Romans who added their own layers. There were enforced restrictions on their use. There was an official canon, also enforced.
I'm curious as to what the differences that disqualify them from being considered intellectual property.
Why weren't they intellectual property? They had a clear owner even after they were co-opted by the Romans who added their own layers. There were enforced restrictions on their use. There was an official canon, also enforced.
I'm curious as to what the differences that disqualify them from being considered intellectual property.
Why weren't they intellectual property? They had a clear owner even after they were co-opted by the Romans who added their own layers. There were enforced restrictions on their use. There was an official canon, also enforced.
I'm curious as to what the differences that disqualify them from being considered intellectual property.