Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jessamyn's avatar

I am a non-admin who does a lot of work on Wikipedia primarily trying to add articles about notable women who somehow do not have pages about them. The tiny fiefdom thing is, to my mind, entirely correct. People who have specific perspectives or grudges, and a posse, and a lot of time, can often just outlast other people in Wikipedia arguments. There is so much reading and so many arcane fiddly aspects of knowing how to do Wikipedia "right" that it can be hard to get any traction in issues like this where someone (or some people) with an agenda decide they're going to go after someone, or an article about them. The good news is that since this article is a redirect (i.e. it points to Dragonball Z) it could, at some future point, be reinstated without the entire thing needing to be rewritten. Cold comfort but good to know, perhaps.

Expand full comment
Austin Ruse's avatar

My Wikipedia page is full of lies, things that I have never said, positions that I have never taken. At one point someone tried to actually quote some of the columns that I have written on controversial subjects and these were rejected because the place the columns ran is not viewed as “reliable“ even though they were my own words that other Wikipedia editors twisted“ in from various blogs.

Expand full comment
80 more comments...

No posts